(or remember dialectics anyone?)
A debate is haunting facebook, a polemic with two sides and angry words. The blogosphere is groaning under the weight of angry proclomations.
As I'm off on holiday for a week, I was going to add my thoughts to this debate but, as Cliff used to say, I will stand on the shoulder of giants by flagging up some of the more interesting links in the debate.
On Greece
- Panos Garganos of SEK (IST affiliate in Greece) in Socialist Worker.
- Stathis Kouvelaki' response in Socialist Worker.
- Alex Callinicos' piece in Socialist Worker.
- Tad Tietze's article on facebook.
It's also worth checking out the debate in Fourth International (the orthodox trots).
- Here is the British sections' piece from Socialist Resistance.
- And the response from the Greek section defending a position closer to that of the IS.
On Egypt
- The RS Statement on the Presidential elections.
- The American ISO's article criticising the RS position.
- A response in the ISO's Socialist Worker.
- Matt Hale's facebook article on the Egyptian Elections.
Conclusion
I don't even have to write these myself as John Molyneux has done a good job here. John, as ever though, is generous in his polemic. I am less forgiving so, simply:
If you think joining Syriza is the way forward you are simply a reformist. Its the height of opportunism, electoralism and centrism. It also, crucially, fails the Greek working class and demonstrates that you no longer see workers self-activity as the key agent of delivering socialism.
Not critically supporting Moursi in the Egyptian election is the worst kind of abstract ultraleftism I've seen. Faced with a tangible threat to the revolution in a situation where, up til now, the class and the Party aren't hegemonic, you have to side with those forces that will increase the confidence of the class - in a decision between Shafiq and Moursi, that means the Brotherhood.
No comments:
Post a Comment